Seen on a pub condom dispenser the other day:
Not, by the way, a gay bar, just a normal pub. Apparently at some stage (probably the 80s, judging by the fading), it was normal for condoms to have insane wavey rainbow things on them. Please note, by the way, that it's the gay/pacifist/socialist 6 colour rainbow. What the take-away message is, I'm not sure.
Sunday, July 27, 2008
A few LispCats
I recently came across LambdaCats, Haskell-themed LolCats. So, I couldn't resist; here are a few LispCats.
I should add that they were created with roflbot, which is itself written in Common Lisp!

SBCL for Windows actually says this on startup, by the way.


I should add that they were created with roflbot, which is itself written in Common Lisp!

SBCL for Windows actually says this on startup, by the way.


Labels:
common lisp,
lispcat,
lolcat,
random
Fun Political Maps
These are rather cool. Animated maps of things like spread of empires and democracy. Some of the actual classifications are dubious; does one really call Apartheid South Africa, or for that matter pre-emancipation US, a democracy in its era? Still, fascinating, a bit like the maps that turn up at the end of a game of Civilization.
Mean old Apple
There's nothing to make you want something like being told you can't have it. I wasn't, before, quite sure that I wanted an iPhone, but now that it is basically unavailable (and I've played with a friend's), I can't wait! Silly Apple and their slow supply line...
Saturday, July 19, 2008
Starship Silliness
Apparently, a well-respected astronomer recently stated that we would never meet intelligent aliens. Not because intelligent life doesn't exist elsewhere, mind you; I don't think that anyone really accepts that one any more. No, because going from one star to another is impossible, you see.
Am I the only one shocked by the sheer arrogance of this assertion? We can't do it right now, so it must not be possible. The thing is that while we can't do it right now, it's not at all unbelievable that we may be about to do it in a century or two. Right now, we really have all that we need to go to another star, except for three rather important things.
The first is a source of cheap, high density energy. We have fission, of course, but fission really isn't good enough to cross to the next star in a reasonable length of time. All going well, we will, relatively soon, have fusion, but the same objection applies; you'd have to carry a lot of fuel to get up to decent speeds and slow down again, and the more fuel you have, the more fuel you need, because you have to accelerate all that fuel. Bussard ramjets, devices which capture and fuse interstellar hydrogen using enormously powerful magnetic fields, powering the fields and accelerating with that fusion, once looked like a decent proposition, but it now appears that there isn't actually enough interstellar hydrogen to make them practical. There is one other obvious option; antimatter. We can, right now, produce tiny quantities, enormously expensively, in particle accelerators. If we could somehow produce it in a reasonably energy-efficient manner, and contain it, well, the sky would no longer be the limit. Journeys would still take many years, but it's only quite recently that we can cross from continent to continent in days; people have made long journeys in the past. People have lived in space for over a year and a half before now. It's not totally mad.
Then there's radiation shielding. It's a big problem if you're going at a respectable fraction of the speed of light; aforementioned interstellar hydrogen will be coming at you so quickly that it will act much like gamma rays. Huge quantities of lead might work, but would add weight. There has apparently recently been some progress by NASA and similar in producing fields to deflect the stuff, amazingly enough, but it's a long way from usable.
Third, and in ways most important, we don't really have the will. Even if we had the other two, it would be an enormously expensive endeavour; why bother?
The thing is, though, we've been in space for slightly over 50 years. In a few centuries, we may have the technology to do this, and we'll have far cheaper production of everything. Cheap energy makes a lot of things possible. If there is other intelligent life out there, it may have been in space for 500 years, or 5000, or 50000. It may be longer-lived than us and think little of spending 50 years in space to get to the next star. It may be more tolerant of radiation than us.
I don't think that anyone reading this will see starships, but equally I think it absurd to assume that humanity will never go to the stars.
By the way, if you're reading this half way to Alpha Centauri, I do apologise; the starship thing obviously takes longer than I expected if you have already worked through the good bits of 21st century Internet, and are reduced to reading this drivel!
Am I the only one shocked by the sheer arrogance of this assertion? We can't do it right now, so it must not be possible. The thing is that while we can't do it right now, it's not at all unbelievable that we may be about to do it in a century or two. Right now, we really have all that we need to go to another star, except for three rather important things.
The first is a source of cheap, high density energy. We have fission, of course, but fission really isn't good enough to cross to the next star in a reasonable length of time. All going well, we will, relatively soon, have fusion, but the same objection applies; you'd have to carry a lot of fuel to get up to decent speeds and slow down again, and the more fuel you have, the more fuel you need, because you have to accelerate all that fuel. Bussard ramjets, devices which capture and fuse interstellar hydrogen using enormously powerful magnetic fields, powering the fields and accelerating with that fusion, once looked like a decent proposition, but it now appears that there isn't actually enough interstellar hydrogen to make them practical. There is one other obvious option; antimatter. We can, right now, produce tiny quantities, enormously expensively, in particle accelerators. If we could somehow produce it in a reasonably energy-efficient manner, and contain it, well, the sky would no longer be the limit. Journeys would still take many years, but it's only quite recently that we can cross from continent to continent in days; people have made long journeys in the past. People have lived in space for over a year and a half before now. It's not totally mad.
Then there's radiation shielding. It's a big problem if you're going at a respectable fraction of the speed of light; aforementioned interstellar hydrogen will be coming at you so quickly that it will act much like gamma rays. Huge quantities of lead might work, but would add weight. There has apparently recently been some progress by NASA and similar in producing fields to deflect the stuff, amazingly enough, but it's a long way from usable.
Third, and in ways most important, we don't really have the will. Even if we had the other two, it would be an enormously expensive endeavour; why bother?
The thing is, though, we've been in space for slightly over 50 years. In a few centuries, we may have the technology to do this, and we'll have far cheaper production of everything. Cheap energy makes a lot of things possible. If there is other intelligent life out there, it may have been in space for 500 years, or 5000, or 50000. It may be longer-lived than us and think little of spending 50 years in space to get to the next star. It may be more tolerant of radiation than us.
I don't think that anyone reading this will see starships, but equally I think it absurd to assume that humanity will never go to the stars.
By the way, if you're reading this half way to Alpha Centauri, I do apologise; the starship thing obviously takes longer than I expected if you have already worked through the good bits of 21st century Internet, and are reduced to reading this drivel!
Labels:
future,
random,
space,
Technology
Tuesday, July 15, 2008
Monday, July 7, 2008
Eccentric of the day
Saw a flock of Japanese tourists earlier today; the leader held aloft an umbrella, metal thing fully extended but umbrella bit not unfurled. Presumably some new innovation in umbrellas which wards off rain using static electricity or anti-gravity or similar. Also, not raining.
Quite like the Japanese tourists, really; they rarely get irritated if am not able to answer their questions about where some obscure street is, and they don't glare when they see one in a gay pride parade. A lot of the American tourists do; assume are from some godforsaken hole in Mid-West where gays are warded off by Ku Klux Klan or something. Why are these people allowed passports?
Quite like the Japanese tourists, really; they rarely get irritated if am not able to answer their questions about where some obscure street is, and they don't glare when they see one in a gay pride parade. A lot of the American tourists do; assume are from some godforsaken hole in Mid-West where gays are warded off by Ku Klux Klan or something. Why are these people allowed passports?
Wednesday, July 2, 2008
Look! Better Comment-y stuff!
Only a few years (about ten) after everyone else, Blogger has, as you can see, got proper comment boxes. You have to explicitly enable them, and you have to be using the Draft control panel for the moment, but they're fine once enabled.
I've had a lot of complaints in the past over the horrors of the conventional Blogger comment posting setup, so hopefully this will be more satisfactory.
I apologise, by the way, for my recent radio silence; I just haven't really felt like blogging...
I've had a lot of complaints in the past over the horrors of the conventional Blogger comment posting setup, so hopefully this will be more satisfactory.
I apologise, by the way, for my recent radio silence; I just haven't really felt like blogging...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

